| ▲ | isege 3 days ago | |
It’s a markdown editor, but they can’t modify the markdown standard, so their scope is limited. All they can do is build features around it. Having a database isn’t mutually exclusive with the core functionality. You can simply not use it. | ||
| ▲ | input_sh 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
To be very pedantic, "Markdown standard" is basically a blog post written over 20 years ago and never updated. Everything more "advanced" like tables, to-do lists and multi-line code blocks aren't a part of the "standard" as it was written, but were added on top by different implementations (like CommonMark) which are now commonly-mistaken for the original Markdown. My point being that this isn't something unique to Obsidian, pretty much everyone does it slightly differently while still calling it "Markdown". | ||
| ▲ | slightwinder 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> It’s a markdown editor, but they can’t modify the markdown standard, They have several modifications of Markdown, everyone has. But not everything makes sense to implement in a flavour of Markdown. YAML is for structured data significant better than a freeform-format, especially when you're in the phase of building the foundation of a new feature-family. The complain is valid, Markdown is for documents, free form, free flow, structured data are a very different use case, and while YAML is better for the job, it's still a different language with different smell. But Obsidian is a tool for managing knowledge, always has been; it's not just a plain Markdown-editor. All those features which are going beyond simple flavoured text, have always been part of it's Core-Mission, just not materialized yet. | ||