▲ | fooker 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> wasnt impactful at all to the physics community There are two reasons why Hinton got the prize. A good majority of modern physics research depends on ML in some aspect. Look at the list of talks at any physics conference and count the number of talks that mention ML in the title. And the 'physics community' has not produced any fundamental physics for a while. Look at the last several years of physics nobel prize. You can categorize the last ten years of prizes into two categories: engineering breakthroughs, and confirming important predictions. Both are impportant, but lacking fundamental physics breakthroughs, they are not clearly ahead in impact compared to ML. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | cutlilacs 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I’m confused why confirming important predictions is considered less impactful than ML in physics. Isn’t experimental confirmation exactly what’s required for a Nobel Prize? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|