| ▲ | tptacek 3 days ago |
| That's ironic, because rapeseed and mustard seed oils are about as closely related as any two food oils can be. |
|
| ▲ | rayiner 3 days ago | parent [-] |
| Other than the genetic engineering and solvent-based extraction of canola oil. But yes, that was my parents reaction as well. Regardless, it’s just butter, ghee, and sometimes olive or avocado oil at my house. Because food and cleanliness taboos are sub-scientific. |
| |
| ▲ | bowmessage 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Totally agree with you. I do not understand how this viewpoint upsets people. | | |
| ▲ | KempyKolibri 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I don’t think people eating butter instead of canola oil is what upsets people. It’s people ignoring the mountain of evidence that such a switch would be a backwards step for health outcomes and claiming the opposite because they read a book by the usual rogues’ gallery of science misinterpreters (Taubes, Teicholz, Shanahan). | |
| ▲ | shlant 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | ant-seed oil is anti-scientific and prays on people being ignorant about the research on health outcomes and relies on emotional appeals and appeals to nature such as "the genetic engineering and solvent-based extraction of canola oil". | | |
| ▲ | bowmessage 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Calling the rejection of a novel highly processed food replacement like this anti-scientific is comically illogical. | | |
| ▲ | tptacek 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Who are you trying to kid? You listed sunflower seed oil alongside canola --- you're presumably just as opposed to mustard seed oil. It would be funny if the one seed oil you're OK with is mustard seed oil, the oil closest in composition to canola, the one oil anyone has a legit gripe about (it doesn't taste very good). |
|
|
|
|