you forgot IoT

IoT wasn't exactly a waste of money. If anything, the problem was that companies didn't spend enough doing it properly or securely. People genuinely do want their security cameras online with an app they can view away from home. It just needs to be done securely and privately.

▲

_carbyau_ 2 days ago | parent [-]

I want a Wireguard-like solution - preferably with an open source Home Assistant plugin - rather than yet-another-subscriber-lockin-on-company-servers.

Investors want otherwise.

	▲	genewitch 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		synology has surveillance station, synology supports wireguard (tailscale, too), there's ios and android surveillance station apps. The software that the synology uses on the backend is open source, so you could set this all up with proxmox or a debian server or something, too. you need to ensure your cameras support either direct access inside the network, or onvif or something like that. IDK, i don't use it anymore, but i did for a good long while, with wifi and wired IP cameras. My synology had a "license" for 12 cameras, but lightning took it out (something about a bunch of ethernet cables in trees), and my new synology doesn't have enough licenses to bother with. anyhow, just thought you should know - "software" "NVR" is available, and has been for over a decade.

▲

ern 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I have 4 cameras, a home security system, a remotely monitored smoke detector, a smart plug, 4 leak sensors, smart bulbs, a car whose location and state of charge I can track remotely, a smart garage door opener, a smart doorbell, and 7 smart speakers.

I think IoT was more than just hype.