new | show | ask | jobs Github

bangaladore 5 days ago

Care to provide constructive feedback/information then rather than a pedantic correction?

▲

mft_ 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

It’s not a pedantic correction, it’s a relevant anecdote to the contrary.

▲

bangaladore 4 days ago | parent [-]

I'd disagree for a couple reasons:

1. We in English can mean different things, from you and I to a broader group. Focusing only on that word without addressing the actual point comes off as a language correction.

2. The original comment made several claims about degradation, pack engineering, and industry history. Ignoring those to focus only on wording misses the main discussion. If the responder focused on a given claim that they refute, that's perfectly fine. They didn't.

	▲	mft_ 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Apologies; re-reading the thread, I now realise I had mistakenly thought you were replying to a different comment. My bad. I'd remove my previous comment but it's too late now. (I thought you'd replied to this comment - hence my thinking it was a relevant anecdote) > You may be right. But we have a Model S 85D from 2015 and basically everything was replaced (seats, all door handles, ac compressor, sun roof, glove box, gauge cluster LCD, main LCD, MPU) except the battery. That's been great, and 10 years in tracking at 85% capacity.

▲

LtWorf 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The comment I responded to was just about one person feelings, trying to involve everyone else in their feelings, it provided no information or way to validate those feelings, hence my response.