▲ | i80and 3 days ago | |||||||
A little surprised that the linked systemd file-hierarchy(7) manpage makes no mention of /opt | ||||||||
▲ | JdeBP 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
You won't find it in the hier(7) manual pages on BSDs, either. * https://man.openbsd.org/hier * https://man.netbsd.org/hier.7 * https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=hier&sektion=7 * https://man.dragonflybsd.org/?command=hier§ion=7 There was a long time when the Linux world held /opt in disfavour, because officially it required either a stock market ticker name or some other corporate identity to make a subdirectory legitimate. You can still see traces of this in the Solaris descendant operating systems, where pkginfo(5) talks about package names using corporate stock ticker names. * https://illumos.org/man/5/pkginfo /opt/SUNW* used to be a very familiar thing to a lot of people. Maybe enough time has passed for anti-corporate memory to fade. Maybe there's enough corporate backing in the Linux world now to resurrect the idea regardless. Maybe /opt/RHT* is the shape of things to come. (-: I've never over the years seen the systemd people advocate for /opt, though. | ||||||||
▲ | creatonez 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
/opt/ is just a dumping ground for crap nobody can find a better location for | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | WhyNotHugo 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
/opt is used for manually-installed software. Packages should never place files there, so it falls out-of-scope for file-hierarchy(7) or hier(7). |