No. I also thought that even a 95% success rate wouldn't be good enough for airplanes.

I just assumed it was developed by Boeing.

	▲	rigrassm 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Thank you for starting my week with a good laugh!

▲

marcosdumay 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As a rule of thumb, airplanes subsystems are expected to have 99.99999% reliability, so the whole gets 99.9999%.

Airline airplanes are currently more than one order of magnitude better than this. But if you have that, you can claim your plane works.

▲

Culonavirus 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's very much enough for drones tho... all you need is a tiny Jensen's chip, moped engine, some boom boom play-doh and you're ready to rock. No remote control needed.

▲

red-iron-pine 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

the AI part is simple. getting past GPS jamming and optical dazzlers so that drone AI can function is hard.

▲

jbreckmckye 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Drones are expensive. Solid six figures expensive. And they are used around or on things that are even more expensive. You wouldn't want ChatGPT piloting them.

▲

Culonavirus 3 days ago | parent [-]

Under $50k for a Geran-2 level drone.

	▲	stockresearcher 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		An autonomous Flock drone costs $275k per year: https://abc7chicago.com/post/oak-brook-police-department-lau...
	▲	jbreckmckye 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Much more for an oil rig platform surveillance drone. And if it crashes into something important, more expensive still.

▲

apwell23 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

we can do it once we know how they work. which will be never.