Yes, of course it should be. You point out of of theain flaws in our system. Those who actually produce things and pay for them never get any ownership. They remain disadvantaged dispite their contributions.

▲

philipallstar 3 days ago | parent [-]

They pay for the thing they get. They exchanged money for product or service. Anyone can start a company and contribute the money required for that company.

▲

guerrilla 3 days ago | parent [-]

> Anyone can start a company and contribute the money required for that company.

No, anyone can't. That's the point. If the money is siphoned out of the lower class, then they have no capital (or free time) to start a business. They're barely getting by. It's a positive feedback loop in both directions (up and down). Rich get rich, poor get poorer (in general).

▲

boppo1 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

If you are upset about 'rich get richer, poor get poorer', you should read up on quantitative easing and how it inflated assets if you're not familiar with the topic yet.

▲

nradov 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Anyone in the USA can. I've met people who started successful small businesses doing things like landscaping and pest control with basically zero capital or free time. They just went ahead and did it.

If you try hard enough you can always find an excuse for failure.

	▲	guerrilla 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		That is notremotely comparable. :D If you try hard enough you can always find an excuse for oppression.