▲ | BrenBarn 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Big companies means more opportunities to lead bugger project. At a big company, it’s not uncommon to in-house what would’ve been an entire startup’s product. And depending on the environment, you may work on several of those project over the course of a few years. Or if you want to try your hand at leading bigger teams, that’s usually easier to find in a big company. Okay, so career development means "bigger projects"? > There’s nothing inherently good about startups and small companies. The good or bad is case-by-case. Well, maybe not, but I think the post illustrates some ways big companies are worse. I'd say that, all else being equal, companies tend to get bigger by becoming more doggedly focused on money, which tends to lead to doing evil things because you no longer see refraining from doing so as important compared to making money. Also, all else equal, a company that does something bad on a small scale is likely less bad than one that does something bad on a large scale. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | Agingcoder 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
projects beyond a certain size in a large org imply things which are very different - people, networking, money, regulations, politics, business, security etc all things which don’t look spectacular when you have three people, but become very important and much harder with hundreds of people. So career development really means ‘learning a completely different skillset which is not technical’ | |||||||||||||||||
|