▲ | preommr 4 days ago | |
I definitely thought this was an anthropic thing that they were trying to spin off into it's own website and app for normies. I am not saying it's infringement, I am just saying that my dumb brain made that connection and I feel like it's not unreasonable to assume that other people might as well. | ||
▲ | mirsadm 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
I also made the assumption. Once I found out it wasn't it was a huge red flag. I don't like it at all. | ||
▲ | iamflimflam1 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Agreed - I was about to send this round to my colleagues. For once reading the comments first has paid off! | ||
▲ | IshKebab 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This is exactly why trademarks exist, and why if they want to bother, Anthropic can 100% make them change the name. Same reason you can't release a handheld console called the Gamegirl, or a voice assistant called Alexis. | ||
▲ | type0 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Once Anthropic starts receiving a wave of support tickets they would be forced to change their name, CLAUDia is just a misspelled ClaudAi | ||
▲ | time0ut 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Oh wow. I thought it was anthropic even after skimming the site. The color scheme and styling is pretty similar. That feels a little slimy. | ||
▲ | mirekrusin 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Same here, first thing I did was to scroll down to see company in the footer and nope... somebody will be receiving legal letters soon I'd guess. | ||
▲ | 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
[deleted] | ||
▲ | tibbon 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Same. But of course, I checked the GitHub first, and I really dislike this confusion. I don't trust someone with my AI tools that's acting like they are trying to trick me into giving them sensitive access. Nope. |