I hear you are invested in this line of thought, and that is okay. I just don’t agree with the analysis, and not with the labeling.

It doesn't rely on work by Eugenicists?

Fortunately, science does not rely on the character of its purveyors but on the quality of the evidence.

	▲	breakyerself 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		The quality of the evidence wasn't any better than the character of the purveyors. You're an apologist for bullshit.