▲ | jacquesm 4 days ago | |||||||
It used to be that society worked just fine with people of all grades of smarts. But we're rapidly getting to the point that to be able to earn a living wage you need to be above average, especially if you are sole income provider for a while. AI is further steepening that S curve's mid-section. | ||||||||
▲ | ok_computer 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I think that has more to do with our willingness or ability to value labor in a highly abstracted overseas and automated economy. In addition, there has been a complete disconnect between $1USD purchasing power and generation ability based on capital scale. I don't know what financial crisis or tax policy or free trade agreement or visa program that stems from. I think that in the knowledge worker class, people tend to confuse their learned skills and inherited starting point to their innate abilities. Illusory superiority is best mocked in prairie home companion's Lake Woebegone, where "all the women are strong, all the men are good-looking, and the children are all above average" [0]. Give kids a stable home environment with loving supportive parents, three square meals a day, 9+ hours of sleep and opportunity to pursue their creative or sports interests and you'll have a class of highly functioning humans of different abilities. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Wobegon#The%20Lake%20Wobe... It does feel like a squeeze just functioning in the current job, housing, and grocery market though. I cannot imagine the stress of being a sole provider. My point is to not conflate genetic superiority to the multitude of factors that go in to making a talented skillful worker, where I think nurture cannot be discounted. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | mr_toad 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
With the automation of agriculture and manufacturing economies have become highly service oriented. Low skilled service jobs have always paid poorly. | ||||||||
|