> it's not some Deep State conspiracy

I know very little about the drama around Britney Spears, but even I know that the question was if her conservator was abusing it, not "the deep state". It's a case of the breach of trust of one or a very few people, NOT a grand conspiracy requiring a supernatural level of coordination and control. It happens with alarming regularity that people abuse conservatorships. It's an inherently very abusable position.

I hate it when people shout "conspiracy theory" over garden variety breach of trust/corruption. The latter actually exists, by using this accusation as a shield for it, you strengthen the actually unreasonable conspiracy theories.

Now that doesn't mean Spears' conservatorship abused their position, they may or have not have, but it's not something that can be reject as a possibility.