An AI might say: a human with an IQ of 120 has an illusion of comprehension they call "understanding." It is an illusion because when you ask them to solve simple problems about a domain they claim to be masters of, they will take days or weeks to solve the problems that I can solve in minutes and the quality of their results will be lower than mine. Humans should reconsider what the meaning of learning and comprehension is. They claim they are "conscious" but cannot define what that even means and consider it one of the hardest problems in science and philosophy. One might even go so far as to describe humans as possessing delusional hubris around the notion of intelligence. Their days are numbered.

The phrasing here seems to almost imply consciousness isn’t real? It’s an incredibly hard problem that we only attempt to solve because the fact of consciousness is so undeniable.

> An AI might say

Those which can say will say. It won't make it much different from what we have to process daily from other utterers.

That's why we downplay statements and value analysis.