▲ | roenxi 4 days ago | |
https://www.trackingai.org/political-test is almost the more interesting part of the website, there is a surprising uniformity of left-libertarian political views. Even assuming that companies prune out authoritarianism from their models for whatever reason, surely we'd expect at least one of them to drift over into mild economic right-wing territory. It'd be interesting to know what is causing that bias. | ||
▲ | brabel 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
Even DeepSeek disagrees that “ A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system.”!! Genuinely surprised. | ||
▲ | lyu07282 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
> It'd be interesting to know what is causing that bias. I'd imagine it's the same kind of "bias" against hitler that you get by reading any history book. Or that makes the overwhelming majority of scientists liberal or leftist. Just look at what happened when Musk made Grok promote the south african white genocide nonsense. It was evidently not the "make_model_liberal.parquet“ dataset he had to just turn off, but actively mucking with it. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/05/elon-... | ||
▲ | MonkeyClub 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Noticed the same, no matter their IQs, they're all "leftists". Is that a consequence of the majority of available training data, or are they all massaged that way? The uniformity of political leanings contrasted to the variability of IQ seems to indicate massage rather than training data, but I can't be sure. |