I totally get that you meant this in a nuanced way, but at face value it sort of reads like...

Joe Rogan has high enough accuracy that I don't have to fact check too often. Newsmax has high enough accuracy that I don't have to fact check too often, etc.

If you accept the output as accurate, why would fact checking even cross your mind?

Not a fan of that analogy.

There is no expectation (from a reasonable observer's POV) of a podcast host to be an expert at a very broad range of topics from science to business to art.

But there is one from LLMs, even just from the fact that AI companies diligently post various benchmarks including trivia on those topics.

Do you question everything your dad says?