I feel like I see these two opposite behaviors. People who formed an opinion about AI from an older model and haven't updated it. And people who have an opinion about what AI will be able to do in the future and refuse to acknowledge that it doesn't do that in the present.

And often when the two are arguing it's tricky to tell which is which, because whether or not it does something isn't totally black and white, there's some things it can sometimes do, which you can argue either way about that being in its capabilities or not.

▲

forgotTheLast 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

I.e. people who look at f(now) and assume it'll be like this forever against people who look at f'(now) and assume it'll improve like this forever

▲

arcastroe 4 days ago | parent [-]

What is f''(now) looking like?

	▲	mxkopy 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Very small. There’s very little fundamental research into AI compared to neural networks from what I can tell

▲

nchmy 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Another very significant cohort is people who formed a negative opinion without even the slightest interest in genuinely trying to learn how to use it (or even trying at all)