Which sounds like weird complain as whole history of videogames was essentially build on failing and trying again. Learning and adapting to changes, part of which is failure doesn't really seem anyway unreasonable to me.

Jimmy tend to have opinions about the games he covers and doesn’t pretend to present some ideal objective review (he had much “hotter” takes about other games in past articles). Take it for what it is and enjoy the ride, I’ve been reading his articles for years - he is an exceptionally prolific writer and the whole site is a treat if you’re interested in computer game history.