It's all about human technology, which enables massive resource consumption.

I should really say humans never truly produce anything in the realm of technology industry.

But that's clearly not true for every technology. Photoshop, Blender and similar creative programs are "technology", and arguably they aren't as resource-intensive as the current generative AI hype, yet humans used those to create things I personally wouldn't consider "waste".

	▲	howtofly 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		The real issue is determining how much non-renewable resource consumption is justified for these "valuable" things? Note that we are always inclined to value ourselves too much. I agree the things you mentioned are valuable in the very common sense and I deliberately assign them no value to the avoid the above issue.