How does "lump of labor fallacy" fare when there is no job remaining that a human can do better or cheaper than a machine?

The list of advantages human labor hold over machines is both finite and rapidly diminishing.

> no job remaining that a human can do better or cheaper than a machine this is the lump of labor fallacy. jobs machines do produce commodities. commodities don't have much value. humans crave value - its a core component of our psyche. therefore new things will be desired, expensive things ... and only humans can create expensive things, since robots dont get salaries