▲ | neilv 5 days ago | |||||||||||||
That looks like an open and shut ICANN trademark case to me. https://web.archive.org/web/20250728091154/https://www.putty... | ||||||||||||||
▲ | TazeTSchnitzel 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
They publish (right at the bottom of that page) the emails where a journalist asked them why they're squatting the PuTTY domain and somehow think they make the journalist look bad?! https://web.archive.org/web/20250728091156/https://www.putty... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | commandersaki 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
There isn't a trademark for PuTTY. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | immibis 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Do they have a trademark? It costs $325 per year plus roughly $650 for the initial application (even if rejected). Is he paying that? |