▲ | Ferret7446 5 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article treats LFS unfairly. It does not in any way lock you in to GitHub; the protocol is open. The downsides of LFS are unavoidable as a Git extension. Promisors are basically the same concept as LFS, except as it's built into Git it is able to provide a better UX than is possible as an extension. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | andrewmcwatters 5 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Using LFS once in a repository locks you in permanently. You actually have to delete the repository from GitHub to remove the space consumed. It’s entirely a non-starter. Nowhere is this behavior explicitly stated. I used to use Git LFS on GitHub to do my company’s study on GitHub statistics because we stored large compressed databases on users and repositories. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|