▲ | jama211 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Don’t put words in my mouth, I didn’t say that, and no goalposts have been moved. You don’t understand how tiny this model is or what it’s built for. Don’t you get it? This model PHYSICALLY COULDN’T be this small and also have decent interactions on topics outside its specialty. It’s like you’re criticising a go kart for its lack of luggage carrying capacity. It’s simply not what it’s built for, you’re just defensive because you know deep down you don’t understand this deeply, which you reveal again and again at every turn. It’s ok to accept the responses of people in this thread who are trying to lead you to the truth of this matter. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | littlestymaar 6 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Don’t you get it? This model PHYSICALLY COULDN’T be this small and also have decent interactions on topics outside its specialty What is “Its specialty” though? As far as I know from the announcement blog post, its specialty is “instruction following” and this question is literally about following instructions written in natural languages and nothing else! > you’re just defensive because How am I “being defensive”? You are the one taking that personally. > you know deep down you don’t understand this deeply, which you reveal again and again at every turn Good, now you reveal yourself as being unable to have an argument without insulting the person you're talking to. How many code contributions have you ever made to an LLM inference engine? Because I have made a few. | |||||||||||||||||
|