|
| ▲ | irthomasthomas 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's hilarious. Imagine going back two years and showing someone GPT-5? They might think the Pause AI movement had won. It makes you ponder an alternate timeline where the OpenAI brain trust wasn't dismantled Which version did you use, though? GPT-5, GPT-5-Thinking, GPT-5 Pro, GPT-5-Mini, GPT-5 with Thinking (reasoning effort=high) or one of the other 18 options? Did you tell it to think harder? Maybe you are just holding it wrong? |
| |
| ▲ | bambax 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Making what is essentially a router dispatching queries to the smallest engine susceptible to answer a question was maybe a good optimization from a techical and business pont of view. But branding that router "GPT5" is a huge marketing mistake, because now, every time a smaller model says something stupid (as they often do), it seems that's the best OpenAI has to offer... |
|
|
| ▲ | nkrisc 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A perfectly grammatical and plausible sentence. Those words all seem quite likely to occur in that sequence. Another LLM success. |
|
| ▲ | boredhedgehog 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| GPT-5 fell into a coma and missed a few critical years. |
|
| ▲ | GoblinSlayer 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Linguistically it's an ok association. If you look at it unconsciously, you can find it plausible too, add 7 but in reverse. |
|
| ▲ | qrios 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Right, I missed a whole decade. (For me 1989, the Mauerfall is the official end of GDR) |