Remix.run Logo
exe34 6 days ago

I hate that kind of destruction of what I think should ultimately be considered property of humanity. When you create something, you're free to destroy or ruin it. Once you share it with somebody else, you should need their consent to destroy it.

dotancohen 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

The social responsibility for ensuring that things could be shared falls on libraries. You might check a few libraries for old copies of vintage media.

My sore spot is the original Rust In Peace album. It was rerecorded and the rerecording is horrible. Any copy of the original is treasure to me.

exe34 5 days ago | parent [-]

> The social responsibility for ensuring that things could be shared falls on libraries.

That's a fair point!

qingcharles 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's the thing: I don't feel like the studios really own something once it is released. It almost becomes the property of the viewers. Things like changing Star Wars is horrifying to most. It's almost as if the public should have to vote on any changes (e.g. I'd probably be willing to vote to remove some flubs, like a mic dangling in frame).

When the Bobs sold Back to the Future they put a clause in the contract that the movies could not be remade or altered in any way without their approval. They nixed the 3D versions that Universal was planned when 3D TVs were in vogue.

iamacyborg 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

This feels like a terribly entitled way to view someone else’s work.

exe34 5 days ago | parent [-]

This feels like an entitlement to disappoint people. If you plan to ruin the experience, don't waste my time on it.