| ▲ | yalogin 6 days ago |
| This is a good point. Stealing is a crime only for end users and not for companies. Why should end users feel any shame violating the DMCA when the government itself says it’s ok for companies to not honor it |
|
| ▲ | crote 6 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| You're not downloading a movie to watch, you are just "acquiring training material" and "reviewing" it to make sure you can use it to train a high-quality model. |
| |
| ▲ | codedokode 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You just want to train a neural network in your head to be more knowledgeable about confronting evil empires, space flights and laser weapon, I think it is a "fair use". It's not like I planned to enjoy it. | |
| ▲ | wyre 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is/would be a fun point, but the illegality isn’t around watching the pirated media. When I torrent a copy of Terminator, the illegal act is acquiring the material, not my watching of it. I’m not a lawyer so I’m sure there is more to this definition. | | |
| ▲ | volkl48 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Not a lawyer but the de facto law has always appeared to only care about uploading. Torrenting gets you in trouble because uploading at least a little bit is inherent to how it (and some other P2P) is supposed to work, and that's enough for a case. Cases against people just downloading have always appeared to be very rare/non-existent, at least from when I used to follow the news on this stuff more. I don't think I've ever seen a case of someone threatened for solely downloading off direct download services, for example. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | stogot 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hold on. There are current lawsuits over this. The companies haven’t been exonerated yet |
|
| ▲ | frollogaston 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If only pirating a CBS show somehow meant getting back at OpenAI. |
