I feel like the math is weird too.

Fermi estimate - doubling my work hours will also halve my waking free time. Doubling my work hours as an individual contributor will not make the company twice as productive. It will not make my stocks worth twice as much.

Does anyone else see the math this way? Employee stock ownership does not give you linear returns with hours worked.

▲

rightbyte 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Fermi estimate - doubling my work hours will also halve my waking free time.

40h work. 56h sleep. 72h free time.

80h work. 56h sleep. 32h free time.

Ok fair enough close enough to half I though the share would be worse. But in practice, your energy is spent and the free time will suck. Also a reasonable commute of 8h will make the share 64 to 24, a 'third'.

▲

silvestrov a day ago | parent [-]

80h work. 56h bad sleep. 0h usable free time due to being drained mentally by work.

	▲	const_cast a day ago \| parent [-]
		Its actually closer to -2000 hours when you factor in the comorbidities of stress-eating taco bell at 10 PM to help you forget the work day.

▲

recursivecaveat a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah the thing with stocks is you have to be in a very tiny company or a critical executive for your individual positive contribution to the value of your shares to be even worth thinking about. Maybe it works psychologically on employees even though it's pretty irrational.