Thankfully??? Did I miss the /s at the end of that? Do you honestly believe it is fairly representing?

I am shocked, shocked I say, at discovering the US Supreme Court engages in politics! I got bad news for you friend: it always has been. That, or maybe you’re one of those knaves who thinks it’s only fair when your side gets to rule.

▲

reciprocity 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I don't think you read his comment for comprehension. Whatever prompted your response does not follow from what the parent comment said.

▲

dylan604 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

What part of my comment leads you to take away whatever is in your head? I just pointed out that SCOTUS is not a fair representation. You've clearly read somethings in between the lines or are confusing other threads.

	▲	sixothree 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I see this so often it gets old especially from a certain side of the aisle. If I make an intentionally contained and concise argument someone always seems to interpret it as if it was part of some larger point I'm making. I used to believe it was a tactic to draw you in. But more and more I believe it's reading comprehension and a good bit of built-in bias.
	▲	MisterMower 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It is by definition representative and fair: Senators chosen by the people approved thier nomination to the court. You’re not this uninformed about how US politics work, are you?