Remix.run Logo
sho_hn 3 days ago

Maybe pick a functional democracy as your yardstick?

dylan604 3 days ago | parent [-]

Can you provide an example? Are there any left?

seadan83 3 days ago | parent [-]

France, UK, Norway, Spain, Canada.. here's your list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index

dathinab 3 days ago | parent [-]

France is worse in the index.

UK, Canada, Spain are similar ranked.

Norway is better ranked, sure so are most other Nordic countries.

But the difference between a (using their terms) "full democracy" and a noticeable better (in the index) "full democracy" is much less noticeable then the difference between a "full democracy" and a "flawed democracy".

The other thing is that is a more then imperfect index. To be able to create such an index you need to select metrics and criteria which are strongly oversimplified. Weather or not this can lead to a bias. Also there is a time delay e.g. 2025 stats are not yet out.

Anyway I'm really getting off topic. The more relevant thing is, that it doesn't matter too much if there are better (or worse) of countries in the index. What rally matters is that you see where your country can improve an try to push for it, even if it's just with voting, otherwise you will stagnate improvements once you reach a relative high standard.