Well, my steelman argument against regulating this repulsive shit: every time a government says it's going to regulate infotech to protect children, it almost invariably ends up having a chilling effect that ends up restricting children's access to high quality educational and medical information. Even if a law is well-intentioned and equitable, its enforcement never is.

In this case, I'm confident that whoever wrote this section, just checking their hard drive should be sufficient to send them to jail.

Its already illegal to distribute pornographic material to children tho. Why shouldn't this be considered that?