| ▲ | geoffpado 6 days ago | |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accolades_received_by_... | ||
| ▲ | margalabargala 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
This includes movies "streamed or distributed" by Netflix. Like the parent mentioned, Netflix has streamed the Godfather. If you click through the movies on that list, you will find that almost none of them were actually produced by Netflix. Movies produced by Netflix are highly likely to be as described, with a small handful of exceptions. | ||
| ▲ | _0ffh 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The Academy Awards? Who the heck cares for those? The only thing they say is "the powers that be in Hollywood chose to highlight your product", but surely the information content regarding quality is as close to zero as it is possible to get. | ||
| ▲ | themafia 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Some of those are other networks shows that just happen to be distributed by Netflix. For example, Wallace & Gromit. This is not a useful set of data to draw conclusions from. Which is precisely the problem that Netflix has. | ||
| ▲ | dexterdog 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
In all of that time there are two best directors and two best supporting actress wins of the major Oscar categories. That is not much considering how much money they have dumped into movies. Netflix has always been quantity over quality. | ||
| ▲ | ZiiS 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Yes, very damming considering their spend to not ever have won a best picture/actor/actress/screenplay. | ||
| ▲ | sunrunner 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I mean when your company has enough money to essentially bankroll the creation of a greater-than-average number of productions and simply pay the individuals involved in the production of these films whatever it takes to get them on board, isn't it sort of inevitable that you end up featuring in the list of awards a greater-than-average number of times? | ||