Remix.run Logo
declan_roberts 4 days ago

Everyone calls X a "dumpster fire" etc, but when I go on there I see see great tech conversations. Database people having fun and chatting about projects. Lots of hackers. A much larger network than bluesky.

Iridiumkoivu 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

This very much my experience as well with current Twitter/X. I think I can at least express myself without having to ponder if the service itself will ban me for saying that ”the king has no clothes on”.

I finally see on my timeline art and music I like. Not to mention the interesting technology-related discussions.

It’s not all sunshine but things are clearly better with a wider range of opinions being present on my timeline and more variety in content. I just wish I could better filter foreign (esp. USA & UK) political content out of my feed.

4 days ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
mrcwinn 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I couldn't agree more. It's like when you see headlines claiming "people" are outraged by a jeans advertisement. Are they really? Who? How many? Really I think it's just something to argue about for entertainment's sake.

Outside of bullying, which I do think is a real risk for kids, I don't feel like the time I spend on social media is unhealthy at all. Granted I'm mostly YouTube, zero percent IG or Facebook. I'm really grateful for what Google bought/built.

Excuse me now as I need to go watch a short that explains the difference between Australian and British accents. Very important, goodbye!

AnIrishDuck 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Excuse me now as I need to go watch a short that explains the difference between Australian and British accents. Very important, goodbye!

I also am a big fan of YouTube for exactly this reason, but you need to be careful.

There's all kinds of great educational content on there.

But, for anything "political" or controversial, YouTube can get toxic very quickly. I believe this is going to be true for most social media as long as engagement is the KPI. It directly incentivizes echo chambers, ragebait, and all kinds of terrible discourse.

jrflowers 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I don't feel like the time I spend on social media is unhealthy at all. Granted I'm mostly YouTube, zero percent IG or Facebook.

This is a good point. Social media isn’t unhealthy if you don’t use it

can16358p 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I use Instagram mostly for educational and artistic content.

It's generally a positive experience for me. It's not the network but what people follow there.

frumplestlatz 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It's like when you see headlines claiming "people" are outraged by a jeans advertisement. Are they really? Who? How many? Really I think it's just something to argue about for entertainment's sake.

The media activist classes were absolutely genuinely offended by it; here are two mainstream pieces from July 28th, five days after the ad campaign launched:

The Washington Post discussing how the ad's tagline reminded them of "the DHS Instagram account, which posted a subtly racist painting a few weeks ago and an explicitly racist painting last week":

https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/2025/07/28/sydney-sween...

An MSNBC opinion piece, by an MSNBC producer: "Sydney Sweeney's ad shows an unbridled cultural shift toward whiteness":

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/sydney-sweeney-a...

"The advertisement, the choice of Sweeney as the sole face in it and the internet’s reaction reflect an unbridled cultural shift toward whiteness, conservatism and capitalist exploitation. Sweeney is both a symptom and a participant."

throw_m239339 3 days ago | parent [-]

Aren't like MSNBC and CNBC part of the same group? isn't CNBC a news channel about capitalism and the free market?

I find it so odd when billion dollar corporations publish pieces like that... like, can't you first look in the mirror? this weird alliance between economic liberalism and that neo marxist intersectionality is so... hypocritical...

extraisland 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I couldn't agree more. It's like when you see headlines claiming "people" are outraged by a jeans advertisement. Are they really? Who? How many? Really I think it's just something to argue about for entertainment's sake.

It is a common tactic to create a new controversy to take attention away from a much more important topic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring

The whole Sydney Sweeney Jeans Advert "controversy" felt like it was AstroTurf-ed.

Less than a few weeks ago. Trump was getting a huge amount of pressure about the lack of transparency with the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. All of that seems to have been forgotten now (or that is at least is my impression).

throw_m239339 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> I couldn't agree more. It's like when you see headlines claiming "people" are outraged by a jeans advertisement.

Well, it turns out that some people are actually outraged by a jeans ads... the problem is that these social networks tend to amplify these sort of divise issues for engagement purposes.

My problem with Twitter/X was that, for instance I was following somebody in 2010's who talked about Javascript and Node, only to end up with that person constantly ranting about partisan issues that had nothing to do with it (especially after Trump election), but at the time, Twitter provided no way to limit feeds to center of interests. That made me quit the platform and I imagine it's getting way wore now...

jacobgkau 3 days ago | parent [-]

Sounds almost like we need something similar to Google+'s circles, but instead of just being able to tag followers/followees into categories, it'd also be useful to be able to tag your own posts into different feeds that people can individually follow or avoid (hashtags aren't really robust enough for this).

Of course, if you see everyone following you for topic X but that nobody wants to hear your opinion about anything else, I can imagine that making it feel like people are just using you as a tool, and that decreasing incentive to participate in the whole thing. But it'd be interesting to try at scale.

throw_m239339 3 days ago | parent [-]

It's funny you talk about Google Plus. the only reason I didn't stay more than 10 minutes on that social media is because of that horrible sticky header that was taking 1/3 of the browser screen on a laptop.

How could that design choice go past basic UI/UX checks is still beyond me after all these years, it made that website horrible to browse.

jacobgkau 2 days ago | parent [-]

I don't remember an annoying header bar, and that's beside the topic of algorithms and content. I do think the UX of circles themselves were much better than e.g. Facebook lists-- circles were much more visual, easier to add/remove people in (drag and drop!), and much more central to the posting experience, which all made them easier to understand and more universally used. Facebook lists feel like an after-thought that only power users even know about at all, and Twitter hashtag/word block lists feel like a heavy-handed last resort rather than something everyone's supposed to use.

weinzierl 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For me it's the complete opposite. I stayed because I thought it's a storm that will pass. I even had hope Elon gets bored with it and writes off the loss. Nothing of this has happened and probably ever will.

Most of the interesting people in my circles have left and the ones that stayed are so disconnected that there is no real community any more.

The end this on a higher note. Would you be willing to share some people to follow that make being on X worthwhile for you.

threecheese 4 days ago | parent [-]

Really it’s the “LLM community”, I’d say ML but I follow plenty of data sciencey folks on Bsky. Lots of LLM folks migrated off Twitter, but it just didn’t take. Network effects imo.

hexator 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can find good content on almost any platform. The problem is when the negatives become so overwhelming, in your face, and hard to ignore, that you feel like it's moving away from what you want it to be. It's not hard to find good tech conversations on Bluesky, they're just lower volume.

stephen_g 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

All the people I cared about left. Most of the replies of anyone with a larger profile were getting filled up by rubbish.

But I'm sure there are still some bubbles of decent content. It was definitely no longer worth being on there for me though.

Jach 3 days ago | parent [-]

Some of the people I cared about left earlier in the Mastodon exodus but when I occasionally check up on them many have just stopped posting there too. It's not really any different from blogs stopping or at least updating very rarely. It happens on Twitter too, people I care about are still there and others have just faded out and gone nowhere. But overall it's not so bad, especially when I stick to the "Following" tab, but the "For You" tab does sometimes surface new interesting people as well and does pretty well at also being a feed for art or photography I like without having to follow specific people. (Of course I have many complaints. Perhaps the biggest is that I never used to use the block feature, but now use it routinely because the "not interested in this post" signal seems to do nothing as far as showing posts from an account less frequently. Then there's the endless waves of bots/bluecheck engagement farmers/etc that get a block if I find them in replies to people I care about and want to make sure I don't see them again in future replies.)

Aachen 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I guess I've always been a bit ideological, also not being on Facebook after the numerous negative examples of how they treat customer data, and so I exclude myself from WhatsApp that is ubiquitous in my country sadly. There's one or two people I would have more contact to, but don't, because they don't think it's worth installing any one of the many messengers I've got installed; it's apparently on me to install the one thing that we all agree is suboptimal at best. Yeah, no thanks, I'm okay over here

Similarly for Twitter. It was an independent company run by people who had, as far as I heard, fine intentions. Like making money and being a good platform can go together, though iirc they weren't great at the former. Then Elon came along and tore down the ethics standards. Idk, I just don't need to be part of that when people have been developing perfectly good alternatives in the meantime. It took a few years but by now I'm not actually sure who's still on Twitter but not (at least also) on Mastodon that I'd like to talk to, but I'm sure there'll be some people if I look for them. I just don't know that it's worth it

I also don't like that it's now a closed website; not really part of the web, idk why they bother having URLs still if you can't view them without signing up first. Not really a great medium for posting/announcing things anymore either

Of course, if you're happy to stay put with your friends, I'm sure you'll be just fine as well without needing to experience too much of what goes on outside of that community. You could use WeChat or anything else for that purpose as well

The only thing I keep recommending to people is to always have at least 2 options: WhatsApp and another messenger. GitHub and some git mirror. Twitter and another microblogger. Then people can choose, communities can move gradually without disruption, you're harder to deplatform, service disruptions aren't as big a deal, and the platforms have to actually compete to be one's choice of where you go first to post and read things

moron4hire 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My problem with Twitter is that it constantly forces unwanted content into my feed. Before I finally quit about a year ago, it was pushing straight-up, no-interpretation-needed, racist and anti-semetic posts into my feed.

If there were a store that secretly sold Nazi propoganda out the back if you gave the owner a special handshake, you'd innocently have no way of knowing and you'd keep shopping at that store. I don't think anyone could hold it over your head that you were shopping at a Nazi store if it were being ran with such discretion.

But if there were a store where the owner occasionally made a little wink-wink-nudge-nudge whoopsy-doodly where he "accidentally" left such stuff out at the checkout counter, just to see if you'd be interested... I'm sorry, there's no way I'd ever go back to that store, no matter how great it's other stuff was. It could be the only place that sold my favorite beer or whatever and it wouldn't matter. Some things are inexcusable.

matthewdgreen 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's both. There are still lots of people having interesting conversations on X, but the second anything gets even the smallest amount of reach your replies will be full of really crummy (and promoted) blue-check trolls interrupting and being angry. The site in general also makes my adrenaline spike in an unpleasant way if I use any of the public feeds for more than about thirty minutes, which seems to be the goal they're optimizing for. I'm happier just avoiding the place.

cmxch 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You aren’t wrong. The people that want BlueSky are the same people who can’t take the heat of actual critics.

futhey 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

X is so large that it can simultaneously be a giant dumpster fire, the most toxic social network ever to exist, and still have room for honest discussion and good communities.

Gives me some hope for Bluesky, etc. I don't think you need to be Twitter scale or have global network effects to work. Your community just has to choose a particular platform and show a preference for it. You get miniature network effects once your community adopts it.

So if your favorite community doesn't like a particular platform, I don't think they're stuck there, just because it's the one with global scale. They just have to organize an exit.

swat535 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

From what I can tell, your experience on X is like everywhere else, it will show you content that you engage with me.

If you follow tech people and engage with those, you get more of them.

I follow DHH, PG, etc and gaming stuff, I get great content.

I also pay premium to not get ads and get Grok for free which is a nice bonus.

alisonatwork 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Speaking as someone who used to visit specific pages on Twitter and use it to follow breaking news by hashtag, at some point a few years ago it became impossible to see new posts in the former case and a login wall was put in front of the latter case. Even when someone shares a direct link to a post nowadays only a small part of the thread is actually visible, which makes visiting the site pointless. So, yes, X is now a dumpster fire. When I go there I don't see great tech conversations, I either see a weird algorithmic top post from years ago, or nothing at all.

Mastodon and Bluesky are intrinsically more valuable, not necessarily because of the quality of the content itself, but because it's actually possible for people to read and search said content.

nkozyra 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The dumpster fire aspect is mostly that it's a thunderdome of engagement bait at this point.

Just thousands of people posting whatever nonsense they can to get their $5 in adshare revenue.

The way they do this - topics, language - is less bothersome to me than the underlying economy of it.

cmxch 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That and there’s actual criticism on X, not just the safe space model that BlueSky creates.

throwaway29812 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

codq 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

marknutter 4 days ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

rexpop 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

paulvnickerson 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

It sounds like you might have problems with "black and white thinking"

rexpop 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Discrete thresholds can be recognized amongst shades of gray.

  @%#*+=-:. 
  %#*+=-:.. 
  #*+=-:... 
  *+=-:.... 
  +=-:..... 
  =-:...... 
  -:....... 
  :........ 
The world may be complex, but it's not noise.
okkdev 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think they might have ethics.

AuthAuth 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

It sounds like they have morals

3 days ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
DonHopkins 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

sunaookami 4 days ago | parent [-]

man can we stop calling everyone a Nazi? It's so tiresome. And there is no such idiom in German btw.

Twitter/X is just like every other social network - follow the topics that interest you and you will get good content.

cosmic_cheese 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Twitter/X is just like every other social network - follow the topics that interest you and you will get good content.

Can’t agree here. I barely use Xitter any more because even when being selective about topics it’s still unsettlingly common to see blue checks showing up in the top of the replies posting some of the most vile things I’ve seen on the publicly accepted internet without the slightest hint of irony.

DonHopkins 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

spencerflem 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

innocentoldguy 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

You mean like this?

https://d2u3dcdbebyaiu.cloudfront.net/uploads/atch_img/391/b...

spencerflem 4 days ago | parent [-]

Show videos - a wave and a salute are different.

bigstrat2003 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Setting aside whether or not Elon was trying to do a Nazi salute (as people have made up their minds on that and aren't going to change), it is factually false to call him a "literal Nazi". The Nazi party doesn't exist, there can't be literal Nazis any more. At most you could accuse him of holding to Nazi ideals, but please be accurate in the accusations you levy. Exaggerating by calling someone a "literal Nazi" is extremely unhealthy for society.

spencerflem 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Dawg, all he talks about is white genocide.

I can compromise on neo-nazi

DonHopkins 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]