| ▲ | petee 2 days ago | |
I misread your first paragraph, and was more responding to the second that I took as supporting the adding the dns implementation in reply to the OP. It may still be required by some users, but I don't think that it makes sense for nginx | ||
| ▲ | 0x457 a day ago | parent [-] | |
> I took as supporting the adding the dns implementation Well, I am supporting it, but I pointed why it's not as straightforward as supporting http-01. > I don't think that it makes sense for nginx It makes sense for nginx because ultimately I don't make certificates just for the fun of it, I do it to give it to some HTTP server. So it makes sense. However, this isn't a future that will be not used by paid users, and F5 seems to be opposing making OSS version users lives better. | ||