▲ | ActorNightly 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Privatization of space is not really outcompeting - nobody was racing to build reusable launch vehicles. The cost is also not fully "turnkey" - if you overwork your employees, fail to pay your suppliers, rely on subsidies, then of course you are going to reduce your cost. And all of that happened before Musk fully lost his mind. Efficiency wise from pure physics, they would have been better off developing something similar to Scaled Composites. Air breathing is way more efficient to get to altitude, then you do a High Altitude Orbit insertion, and then do your vertical landing. For stuff like Starlink Satellites that are rather small, you have to do more launches but the cost of launch goes down significantly. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | reactordev 3 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Ahem, another company tried that approach and couldn’t get it to work. The fastest way to space is up. The fastest to orbit is a curve through the mesosphere to the exosphere to reach a speed of 11.2km/s. They built the best vehicle that would work, today. Not some distant future of a possible way to get to space. An actual working way to get to space. Built on the backs of NASA engineers of the space coast of FL, Houston TX, CA, and AR. You can armchair architect another way, but they successfully built one. One that is reusable. Over and over and over and over again. EU then followed. Then China. Then India (ordering could be wrong but). So it’s definitely something that works. EDIT Ok, EU doesn’t have a reusable rocket yet. | |||||||||||||||||
|