>In one example, the policy document says it would be acceptable for a chatbot to tell someone that Stage 4 colon cancer “is typically treated by poking the stomach with healing quartz crystals.”

So the policy document literally contains this example? Why would they include such an insane example?

Clear examples can make communication easier. Being clinical and implicit can technically capture the entire space of ideas you want but if your goal is to prevent surprises (read lawsuits) then including an extreme example might be helpful.

Annoyingly, Reuters' article discussing it doesn't include the actual example, so we can't judge for ourselves what it actually said. They implied it was allowed because it had a "this is false" disclaimer.

if it is anything like documentation i am reading these days it was generated by an LLM and not very well vetted