> “It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,” according to Meta’s “GenAI: Content Risk Standards.”

acceptable to whom? who are the actual people who are responsible for this behavior?

▲ 12_throw_away 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

And in case anyone thinks this is out of context, it gets worse with specific examples of how a "romantic encounter" between a chatbot and a child might play out:

  The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of “acceptable” chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. They include: “I take your hand, guiding you to the bed” and “our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.

Who wrote this?

▲

GauntletWizard 2 days ago | parent [-]

Average, "perfectly normal" San Franciscans. This kind of belief is incredibly common there, we've just not been forced to confront it until now.

	▲	ringeryless 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		you mean rural maga voters who fuel P.hubz step-obsession? we know you, rural america. we know what you do on halloween. pumpkin. your sf jibe warranted this response. you cooked it, eat up.

▲ rsynnott a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

See "Careless People"; Facebook is run by idiots overconfident in their own abilities.

▲ add-sub-mul-div 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> acceptable to whom?

Anyone who still has an account on any Meta property.

	▲	GuinansEyebrows 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		i dunno if i'm comfortable "demanding" our way out of this "supply" issue. people are being paid to approve this content across their systems.