Stocking a book in a library is not speech from the government. If it were, we couldn't have religious books in school libraries, but we do.

▲

poplarsol 3 days ago | parent [-]

If stocking a book is not speech then it is not a restriction on speech to decide not to stock a book.

▲

epistasis 3 days ago | parent [-]

Any individual decision, no. A systematic bias over many decisions could be a restriction on speech. (Edit: some systematic biases over the decisions are restrictions on speech that are unconstitutional, but not all.)

A law of the sort that was struck down is clearly an unconstitutional restriction on speech.

	▲	Levitz 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		On whose speech? It seems more and more that the elephant in the room here is that schools are part of government, but they overwhelmingly lean the opposite side of the administration and they want to exercise their speech through their positions, but the government doesn't want to allow that. Private individuals would of course enjoy first amendment protections on speech, but if you are government you don't get your speech restricted by government, that's just government. You can't eat your cake and have it too.