| ▲ | pm90 6 days ago |
| I don't think any existing numbers were officially changed, just that the head of BLS was fired. |
|
| ▲ | outside1234 6 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yes, for THAT head of the BLS. It is super clear to the next head of the BLS that they deliver the number the president likes or they will be fired. So, just like in Venezuela, that number will be delivered. |
| |
| ▲ | JKCalhoun 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Picturing a future political cartoon of hobo-looking guys sitting around a winter fire burning in an old oil drum — one guy is holding up a newspaper (wut?) and saying to the rest, "Hey guys, it's fine because it says here that the employment numbers reported are the best ever!" | | | |
| ▲ | whimsicalism 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | wanna bet? i will take a bet that inflation will not return to normal (ie. sub 2.1) in the next report | | |
| ▲ | outside1234 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Sure it will. BLS guy will publish that number regardless. That said, I also think there is a good chance of that because we will be in a recession by then from the tariffs. | |
| ▲ | Supermancho 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Indeed, a gentleman's bet. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hiddencost 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They fired the head of the BLS because they didn't like the numbers. Explicitly. You kinda have to conclude they're going to cook the books. Like they're doing everywhere else. |
| |