new | show | ask | jobs Github

StopDisinfo910 4 days ago

> How come Google doesn't want to have anything with Oracle

They clearly don’t want to add anything which couldn’t be reasonably covered by the result of the previous trial.

The list you give was all already there then. Moving to a more recent version of Java wouldn’t be.

> OpenJDK is mostly a product from Oracle employees (about 80%)

Sun employees, not Oracle employees. Using Sun technology was fine, using Oracle technology is something else entirely.

▲

pjmlp 4 days ago | parent [-]

I advise you to educate yourself who works and owns OpenJDK copyrights.

Can start here, https://dev.java/contribute/openjdk/

"Once you have contributed several changes (usually two) you can become an Author. An author has the right to create patches but cannot push them. To push a patch, you need a Sponsor. Gaining a sponsorship is usually achieved through the discussions you had on the mailing lists.

In order to become an Author, you also need to sign the Oracle Contribution Agreement (OCA)."

The go into https://openjdk.org/bylaws

"The OpenJDK Lead is an OpenJDK Member, appointed by Oracle, who directs the major efforts of the Community, which are new implementations of the Java SE Platform known as JDK Release Projects."

And this nice contribution overview from Java 22,

https://blogs.oracle.com/java/post/the-arrival-of-java-22

"Of the 26,447 JIRA issues marked as fixed in Java 11 through Java 22 at the time of their GA, 18,842 were completed by Oracle employees while 7,605 were contributed by individual developers and developers working for other organizations. Going through the issues and collating the organization data from assignees results in the following chart of organizations sponsoring the development of contributions in Java:"

To spare you the math, 77% were done by Oracle employees.

Now please show us how Kotlin compiles for Android without using Java.

Doesn't look like Google got rid of Oracle to me, more like they didn't even considered Dart, nor Go could stand a chance against the Java ecosystem among Android developers.

▲

StopDisinfo910 4 days ago | parent [-]

You wrote than 80% of OpenJDK was written by Oracle employees. That’s patently untrue. Most of OpenJDK was written by Sun employees before Oracle bought Sun.

Your link doesn’t change any of that nor your clearly condescending comment before. You are perfectly aware of the fact by the way and you know exactly what I meant so I don’t really understand the game you are playing.

Oracle can claim Sun contribution as their own as much as they want. It doesn’t change the fact that you would have to be insane to touch anything they do now that it’s Oracle property.

▲

pjmlp 4 days ago | parent [-]

What is pathetic is the quality of your answers, who do you think has written the code between Java 6 and Java 24?

I wonder what magic pixie dust has been writing Java code since 2013, those Sun employees have been working really hard on their ghost offices, surrounded by Oracle daemons, down in the dungeons.

I am playing the FACTS game.

▲

StopDisinfo910 4 days ago | parent [-]

There is no facts game. I am in full agreement with you that Oracle maintains Java nowadays and writes most of the modern code in it. It remains originally a Sun product, a Sun initiative and most of the JVM historical code has been written by Sun. I have little interest in going to actually look in how many lines are from then and how many are new. It wouldn’t substantially change the nature of my argument anyway.

You are free to pretend that Oracle is a great steward of the Java ecosystem if you want or that they had a point in the trial they so brilliantly lost.

I’m free to say I vehemently disagree and perfectly understand why Google would rather stay far away.

I would rather prefer you didn’t insult me however but you do you.

	▲	vips7L 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Oracle has been a fantastic steward of Java. I don’t think Java would exist or still be popular without them. Java is in its best state it’s been in decades.