| ▲ | spacedcowboy 4 days ago |
| unless it’s an Apple data center, populated by the server version of the latest ultra chips… |
|
| ▲ | 0manrho 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| What makes you think that? They're small and efficient, that means they can pack large numbers of those into small spaces, resulting in a similar large power draw per volume occupied by equipment in the DC. This is especially true with Apple's "Ultrafusion" tech which they're developing as quasi-analog to Nvidia Grace (Hopper) superchips. |
| |
| ▲ | spacedcowboy 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Because I worked on them, before retiring. Yes they’re packed in; no they still don’t draw the same levels of power. | | |
| ▲ | 0manrho a day ago | parent [-] | | Didn't saw they draw the same, I openly acknowledge their more efficient. Said power user per rack unit is trending up. This is true of Apple DC's as well, especially with their new larger/fused chip initiatives. It's an universal industry trends especially with AI compute, and Apple is not immune. | | |
| ▲ | spacedcowboy a day ago | parent [-] | | Let me rephrase to: No, they (collectively) don’t draw the same levels of power. I know what amperage is drawn by each rack. It’s nowhere near as much as was drawn by the older intel-based racks. And yes, they’re packed densely. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | deafpolygon 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| at that point, they're powered by a bicycle. |
