▲ | pclmulqdq 2 days ago | |
There's an implied one bit, so you actually have a 53 bit significand (and 53-bit precision) given only a 52 bit mantissa. | ||
▲ | fiforpg 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
Right, I did realize after posting that close to numbers of the form 1{hidden bit} + (1-2^-52){mantissa with all ones} the relative accuracy — corresponding to the absolute accuracy of a single bit in mantissa — is about 2^-53. The hidden bit is easy to forget about... |