Feel free to provide and support a "stable" branch/fork that meets your standards.

Be the change you want to see!

Edit to comment on the edit:

> Edit: Downvote me all you want

I don't generally downvote, but if I were going to I would not need your permission :)

> that's reality folks, if you don't release v1.0.0, the interface you consume can change without you realizing it.

I assume you meant "present" there rather than "consume"?

Anyway, 1.0.0 is just a number. Without relevant promises and a track record and/or contract to back them up breaking changes are as likely there as with any other number. A "version 0.x.x" of a well used and scrutinized open source project is more reliable and trustworthy than something that has just had a 1.0.0 sticker slapped on it.

Edit after more parent edits: or go with one of the other many versioning schemes. Maybe ItIsFunToWindUpEntitledDicksVer Which says "stick with 0.x for eternity, go on, you know you want to!".