| ▲ | ggoo 3 days ago |
| Particle board: - degrades faster, necessitating replacement - makes the average quality of all wood furniture notably worse - arguably made the cost of real wood furniture more expensive, since fewer people can make a living off it. Not to say the tradeoffs are or are not worth it, but "80% of the real thing" does not exist in a vacuum, it kinda lowers the quality on the whole imo. |
|
| ▲ | pixl97 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| How about - There are 8 billion people on the planet now and there isn't enough high quality furniture quality wood to make stuff for all of them. Up until the time of industrialization there just wasn't that much furniture per person in comparison to what we have now. The reason 'real' wood furniture is more expensive is not that there isn't demand or artisans creating it, there are likely more than ever. Go buy hardwood without knots and see how much the materials alone set you back. The trade off isn't 'really good furniture' vs 'kinda suck furniture'. It's 'really good furniture' vs 'no furniture at all'. |
| |
| ▲ | jcgl 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Knotty softwoods can make perfectly suitable furniture. They can (and are) grown at scale. I’m sympathetic to the viewpoint that the supply particleboard furniture has suffocated the marketplaces for mid- and low-end wooden furniture. Such pieces definitely exist affordably (I’ve bought them at places like Marshall’s, for instance). But they seem comparatively underrepresented in the market. Maybe a consumer preference for flatpack furniture is enough to explain this? But then again, wooden furniture can be flatpacked too—ikea has plenty of it. | |
| ▲ | phyzome 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you make better furniture, it will last longer, and you don't need as much wood to serve the same number of people. It will cost more, sure, but that keeps people from just throwing it out; they sell it instead of throwing it out. The amortized cost is probably similar or even better, but less wasteful. | |
| ▲ | pluto_modadic 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | (per capita) buy one cabinet every time you move (they break if you try to move them), or buy one quality piece of wood furniture and resell it when you don't want it. it's disposable plates vs dishwasher ones, but particle board vs actual furniture | |
| ▲ | ggoo 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You did not read my comment very well. I was not commenting on the the particle board tradeoff, or even the AI tradeoff we find ourselves in now. I was saying that reduction to a lower common denominator (80%), even though it seems innocuous, actually does have broader effects not usually considered. |
|
|
| ▲ | andrewla 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > it kinda lowers the quality That's why it's "80% of the real thing" and not "100% of the real thing". |
|
| ▲ | doug_durham 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Who said anything about particle board. There is factory created furniture that uses long lasting high quality wood. It will last generations and is still less expensive than handcrafted furniture. |
