Again, false dichotomy. If Debian's maintainers don't put things in the package manager with dodgy behavior, that's not a walled garden like iOS

Not having to check your cereal for razor blades is also a freedom

▲

amiga386 5 days ago | parent [-]

You're asking Debian to check out all aspects of a program and hold them liable if it does something you don't like, or their volunteers does something you don't like.

That's not what Debian is doing. Debian is asking for volunteers to package the world's free software, also written by volunteers. They have their own checklists, your "dodgy behaviour" concerns aren't on it. Confirming the software meets your expectations depends on you evaluating it. If it doesn't, you can then volunteer your time to write them a bug report, which they might or might not accept and fix.

▲

anonymars 5 days ago | parent [-]

They did. The article exists. The package manager behavior was changed accordingly. It doesn't automatically include that plug-in. My understanding was you scoffed at the "paternalism" and said part of the fun is that there might be terrible behaviors. Others disagree.

	▲	amiga386 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Indeed there were terrible behaviours, and they were fixed. My scoffing is at people who believe these behaviours should never have happened, or it shouldn't be possible. Unless there is a omnipotent tyrant, there will be the possibility that you encounter terrible behaviours, and the possibility that those who could fix them, don't. You can try advocating to the maintainer that they should fix it, you can even try leading a campaign against the maintainer. If they still disagree, you can fix it yourself, with the source they gave you, and you can publicise your fixed version, which people might adopt over the other version if enough people agree with you. That is the fun!