> It's just that you also want to write about what you're thinking in response to reading such people and ideally have what you write critiqued by smart people. Perhaps an AI could do some of that these days.

An AI can neither write about what you are thinking in your place nor substitute for a particularly smart critic, but might still be useful for rubber-ducking philosophical writing if used well.

▲

sien 7 days ago | parent [-]

Errrf. That was poor writing on my part.

I meant use the AI to critique what you have written in response to reading the suggested authors.

Yes, a particularly smart critic would be better. But an LLM is easily available.

	▲	elliotto 7 days ago \| parent [-]
		I find using an AI to understand complex philosophical topics one of my most unexpected use cases. Previously, I would get stuck scrolling through wikipedia full of incredibly opaque language, that assumes a background I don't have. But I can tell a bot what my background is, and it can make an explanation that is in the right level of complexity. As an example, I'm reading a book on Buddhism, and I'm comfortable with Kant, and AI is useful for explaining to me a lot of the ideas they have as they relate to transcendental idealism (Kant). On the other hand, I still don't know what a body without organs is.