I never said I held the belief, just that it's reasonable

A set of beliefs which causes somebody to waste their life in misery, because they think doom is imminent and everything is therefore pointless, is never a reasonable set of beliefs to hold. Whatever the weight of the empirical evidence behind the belief, it would be plainly unreasonable to accept that belief if accepting it condemns you to a wasted life.

▲

taberiand 7 days ago | parent [-]

Why would it cause someone to waste their life in misery? On a personal level, for everyone, doom is imminent and everything is pointless - 100 years is nothing, we all will die sooner or later. On larger time scales, doom is imminent and everything is pointless - even if everything was perfect, humans aren't going to last forever. Do people waste their lives in misery in the face of that reality? Why would believing humans are likely to wipe themselves out due to climate change lead to misery?

If anything, avoiding acknowledging the reality and risk of climate change because of the fear of what it might mean, is miserable.

	▲	lupusreal 7 days ago \| parent [-]
		It's the premise from the article we're discussing, where believe in imminent doom makes life feel pointless and preempts anything good somebody could be doing with their life. > These beliefs can make it difficult to care about much of anything else: what good is it to be a nurse or a notary or a novelist, if humanity is about to go extinct?