▲ | lysace 5 days ago | |||||||
Meh. Similar pricing and availability compared to its primary competitor at the time: Arduino. It was just too unusual in too many ways. In one way it’s a bit like the Amiga vs the 8088/8086 PC. | ||||||||
▲ | duskwuff 5 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
"Arduino" is a brand of development boards. The direct equivalent would be the Atmel* ATmega168, and that was widely available through distributors, less expensive, had extensive manufacturer and community support, and was part of a broad product line. What makes microcontrollers commercially successful is... commercial use. Hobbyist applications are fun, but they don't pay the bills. *: Microchip hadn't bought them yet | ||||||||
|