▲ | hirako2000 3 days ago | |
The issue is that you would be not just clueless but grown naive about the correctness of what it did. Knowing what to do at least you can review. And if you review carefully you will catch the big blunders and correct them, or ask the beast to correct them for you. > Claude, please generate a safe random number. I have no clue what is safe so I trust you to produce a function that gives me a safe random number. Not every use case is sensitive, but even building pieces for entertainment, if it wipe things it shouldn't delete or drain the battery doing very inefficient operations here and there, it's junk, undesirable software. |