A new triangle:

    Accurate
    Comprehensive
    Satisfying

In any particular context window, you are constrained by a balance of these factors.

▲ guerrilla 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not sure this works. Accuracy and comprehensiveness can be satisfying. Comprehensiveness can also be necessary for accuracy.

	▲	csours 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		They CAN work together. It's when you push farther on one -- within a certain size of context window -- that the other two shrink. If you can increase the size of the context window arbitrarily, then there is no limit.

▲ layer8 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Not sure what you mean by “satisfying”. Maybe “agreeable”?

Satisfying is the evaluation context of the user.

Many would be satisfied by an LLM that responds accurately and comprehensively, so I don’t understand that triangle. “Satisfying” is very subjective.

And LLMs are pretty good at picking up that subjective context

	▲	layer8 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		How would they possibly do that on a first prompt? Furthermore, I don’t generally let LLMs know about my (dis)satisfaction level. This all doesn’t make sense to me.