| |
| ▲ | eru 4 days ago | parent [-] | | How is this obnoxious? C and C++ have their strengths, but rapid prototyping is generally not seen to be amongst them. This shouldn't be any more controversial than saying that pure Python is generally slow. | | |
| ▲ | m-schuetz 4 days ago | parent [-] | | They are pretty much the best choice for prototyping 3D apps and GPU algorithms. They're fast, powerful, and don't impose restrictions - you can do whatever and however. It also helps that CUDA is C++. | | |
| ▲ | eru 3 days ago | parent [-] | | > They're fast, powerful, and don't impose restrictions [...] By that metric assembly is the best prototyping language. | | |
| ▲ | m-schuetz 3 days ago | parent [-] | | You are arguing in bad faith, raising non-issues with obvious answers, making it unfortunately pointless to have a discussion with you. |
|
|
|
|
